I understand that the HHS would be more correct saying they will determine "sex", rather than "gender". I hope it is not a journalist's "error", because we know about the memo only from the paper.
Yes, the whole point must be "throwing a bone", and if so this is another in the list of reasons for me not to be able to unequivocally support this administration.
Yes, I don't know much about the "psychological gender", tend to believe the specialists by default. I'd be happy just to understand women better, which I don't even consider as "setting the bar low". So I have no hope of understanding the non-binary gender nuances. My big problem with this letter is not at all related to which side better understands gender.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2018-11-04 05:06 pm (UTC)Yes, the whole point must be "throwing a bone", and if so this is another in the list of reasons for me not to be able to unequivocally support this administration.
Yes, I don't know much about the "psychological gender", tend to believe the specialists by default. I'd be happy just to understand women better, which I don't even consider as "setting the bar low". So I have no hope of understanding the non-binary gender nuances. My big problem with this letter is not at all related to which side better understands gender.